Skip to main content

trial experience

and so i used envelope budgeting and achieved some results: not that astonishing though. i budgeted my last Php1732.00 yesterday to make it last until tuesday, just before the next pay day. i got 4work nights and 2 offs. i need Php250 per work day, which means Php1000 so i still have extra Php732 since i dont have debts and bills to pay for now. that's a good sign considering i'm already thinking that i'll have no money when tuesday comes. what makes it work? here are what i saw


  1. big view on a small scale - i never get to see the whole picture when i spend or swipe: especially swipe. because there's something with buying that makes me feel easy and comfortable that i want to do it again. without consulting the purse. but last night i saw the details on my spending. i know i love food and that was the time i realized that i eat for comfort. so, i know i spend too much on that part and that's where i need to watch out.
  2. preventive measure - knowing that i only have money for food and transportation made me back-off on those luscious donuts with custard inside and icing on top. need i say more?
these are just two of, i should say, benefits that it can offer. i have some more at the back of my mind. but i just got back from work and i want to sleep. so, ponder on these for and i'm pretty sure you'll have your own list once you've tried this envelope thingy.

Popular

The Architecture of Self: Metacognition, Emotional Intelligence, and the Dynamic Control System Within

I. The Right Question Most discussions of Emotional Intelligence treat it as a companion to cognition — a soft counterpart to the harder work of reasoning. Most discussions of metacognition treat it as a neutral, elevated faculty: the mind watching itself from a clean remove. Both assumptions are wrong. The productive question is not whether EQ and metacognition matter — they clearly do — but what is the structural relationship between them, and more precisely: what regulates what, under which conditions? That question — not "what serves what?" but "what governs what, and when?" — is the organizing principle of this framework. It reframes the entire discussion from static hierarchy to dynamic control architecture. Everything that follows depends on that shift. II. The Conventional View and Its Limits The standard position holds that EQ and metacognition are co-equal, mutually reinforcing capacities. EQ supplies the affective sensitivity that keeps cognition ...

adfly: make money on the web

adf.ly is a money generating, link shortener. how you say? give the link to adf.ly adf.ly will make the link short you post the link(on twitter, facebook, forums, etc) they click the link adf.ly gives you money for that requirements: email add, which i'm guessing you already have paypal or alertpay account, click on the links to create an account sites to post you links ( twitter , facebook , forums, blogs etc) now, this is just a business tool. my advise, don't be stuck with just that! learning how to create contents is just as important.

Artificial Intelligence Does Not Understand

Artificial Intelligence does not understand, at least not in the way humans mean the word understanding. This is not a criticism of AI’s capability, but a clarification of context. The confusion arises because we collapse multiple meanings of “understanding” into a single, unexamined concept. When AI performs well in language, reasoning, or problem-solving tasks, we intuitively project human comprehension onto it. But this projection ignores a critical distinction: understanding is not a monolith, but is stratified across contexts. Without contextual stratification, discussions about AI intelligence, alignment, and consciousness become incoherent. We argue past each other, using the same word while referring to fundamentally different phenomena.