Skip to main content

copying and pasting


sitting down doing nothing is not that all unproductive. in my case, it pushed me to think about small things in life. and one of them is "copy and paste". i know it's silly but just think of it. when was it first used? to what machine and what operating system? how was it conceived or how did originate? now, if you ask why is it important to discuss this, it is not. well, not so important, in general. my point, anything can be worth blogging. even just the tiniest, unrespected matter or, in this case, action.

let's define it first. copying and pasting requires the action of highlighting a certain character, file or element first. then, copying by several means like pressing ctrl+C or clicking file on drop down menu the selecting the word "copy". finally, going to where it is to be pasted and pasting it by, this time, pressing ctrl+V or clicking file on drop down menu the selecting the word "paste". let me remind you that this is only limited to what i know. other procedures and articles are all over the net.

next, how did it came about? let me check google.

The term "cut and paste" comes from the traditional practice in manuscript-editings whereby people would literally cut paragraphs from a page with scissors and physically paste them onto another page. This practice remained standard as late as the 1970s. Stationery stores formerly sold "editing scissors" with blades long enough to cut an 8½"-wide page. The advent of photocopiers made the practice easier and more flexible. 
- wikipedia
now it gets more interesting. isn't it nice to know that there's a lot that you can do on your spare time?

ps: can anyone please coin a word for copy/paste?
Labels:

Popular

Contextual Stratification - Chapter 12: No Floor

The Search for the Bottom Throughout history, humans have searched for the ground floor of reality, the most fundamental level from which everything else emerges. The ancient Greeks proposed atoms: indivisible particles that couldn't be broken down further. Two thousand years later, we discovered atoms could be split, revealing electrons, protons, and neutrons. Surely these were fundamental? Then we found that protons and neutrons contained quarks. Perhaps quarks are fundamental? String theory suggests they might be vibrations of one-dimensional strings. Perhaps strings are fundamental? Some theories propose even strings are composed of more basic structures; branes, loops, or mathematical objects we don't yet have names for. Each generation believes it has reached the bottom, only to discover deeper structure. This could be a temporary state, we just haven't dug deep enough yet. Eventually we'll hit the truly fundamental level, and the digging will stop. Or it could be...
Read more

Contextual Stratification and Wittgenstein: From Language Games to Cognitive Architecture

Wittgenstein cracked a quiet truth that philosophy spent centuries missing: meaning doesn’t live in words but in use. A word means what it does in a situation, not what a dictionary freezes it to be. His concept of language games exposed how science, law, religion, and daily speech each operate under different rules, even when they reuse the same vocabulary. Contextual stratification is the next move. Where Wittgenstein described the phenomenon, contextual stratification structures it. Language games become explicit layers, like distinct strata where concepts are valid, coherent, and internally consistent. Confusion arises not from disagreement, but from dragging ideas across layers where they don’t belong. Most arguments aren’t wrong; they’re misplaced. Wittgenstein believed philosophical problems dissolve once we see how language is actually used. Contextual stratification operationalizes that belief: instead of debating meanings, you locate the layer. Instead of refuting claims, you...
Read more

Contextual Stratification - Chapter 21: No Theory of Everything

  The Most Seductive Dream There is a dream that haunts physics, philosophy, and the human imagination itself: one equation. One framework. One truth that explains everything. Einstein spent the last decades of his life searching for it, a unified field theory that would reconcile gravity with electromagnetism, that would show all forces as manifestations of a single underlying reality. He failed, but the dream didn't die. String theory arose promising eleven dimensions and one fundamental entity, vibrating strings from which all particles and forces emerge. Loop quantum gravity offered another path. M-theory suggested a framework encompassing all frameworks. The quest continues. Physicists still seek the Theory of Everything (TOE) the final equation that would subsume quantum mechanics and relativity, explain all particles and forces, predict all phenomena. The dream is powerful because it promises ultimate understanding. No more mysteries. No more competing frameworks. No more b...
Read more