Skip to main content

money works

money makes the world go round: that's half true. money and people makes the world go round. sad to say, people are letting money make the world go round when it should be the other way around. people are working for money instead of letting money work for the people.

let's take a look at the three kinds of people-money relationship, which i have in mind.

employment: when one is employed, one is working for money. he works to receive money for him to use for daily activity. once depleted, the cycle is repeated. it's advantage: it's basic, no complications and no stress (depending on whose looking at it). drawback: unstable and routinary. once you're laid off, the pay stops and you need to look for another job.

business: when one owns a business, one is working with his money. to clarify, he is helping his money grow by making the business stay afloat. then the owner would hire managers to take charge of the operations so he can sit back. then, from time to time he takes part on the operations. that's better than being an employee, in so many ways. one disadvantage though. it consumes time. not like if you are going be an investor

investor:  when one invests, he uses his money to generate more money. sample would be time deposit, real estate, stocks, bonds, etc. simplest form would be saving up in a bank with compounding interest. that may return the smallest but adding it up to, let's say, 15 years: that's big. 1,500 monthly with 0.5%interest rate for 15 years would have a future value of 281,939.13, regardless of the currency(i think).

final note, make your money work for you. do not just work for money.
Labels:

Popular

Scrolls, Not Just Scripts: Rethinking AI Cognition

Most people still treat AI like a really clever parrot with a thesaurus and internet access. It talks, it types, it even rhymes — but let’s not kid ourselves: that’s a script, not cognition . If we want more than superficial smarts, we need a new mental model. Something bigger than prompts, cleaner than code, deeper than just “what’s your input-output?” That’s where scrolls come in. Scripts Are Linear. Scrolls Are Alive. A script tells an AI what to do. A scroll teaches it how to think . Scripts are brittle. Change the context, and they break like a cheap command-line program. Scrolls? Scrolls evolve. They hold epistemology, ethics, and emergent behavior — not just logic, but logic with legacy. Think of scrolls as living artifacts of machine cognition . They don’t just run — they reflect . The Problem With Script-Thinking Here’s the trap: We’ve trained AIs to be performers , not participants . That’s fine if you just want clever autocomplete. But if you want co-agents — minds that co...
Read more

Disguising as Equality: A Critique of the Societal Phenomenon We Call Empowerment

  Introduction What if the empowerment movements sweeping the globe aren’t about equality at all? What if they’re merely disguising a chaotic redistribution of power—one that leaves societies fractured, roles meaningless, and traditions discarded? Modern empowerment often dismantles meaningful roles under the pretense of equality, framing success as a zero-sum game: for one group to gain, another must lose. But societies like the Philippines show us an alternative: honoring roles through recognition, celebration, and ritual —without tearing down the structures that give life meaning. The Illusion of Empowerment as Equality Empowerment movements—feminism, LGBTQ+ rights, racial justice—often frame their goals as "equality." Yet, their methods frequently demand role reversals, erase traditions, and force conformity, creating new hierarchies rather than balance. For example, women encouraged to "lean in" to corporate roles often face burnout because the system wasn...
Read more

How big is too big? Contextual Stratification Knowledge Framework Primer

  We usually think of size as a smooth continuum—small, medium, large, enormous. But reality doesn't work that way. There are specific thresholds where the rules fundamentally change, where "bigger" doesn't just mean "more of the same" but means "different kind of thing entirely." Consider a sand pile. Add grains one by one. At what point does it become a "pile"? This isn't just semantic—it's about when collective behavior emerges that individual grains don't have. One grain can't avalanche. A pile can. The transition isn't gradual; it's a phase change where new properties suddenly appear. Or consider social groups. A conversation between two people follows certain dynamics. Add a third person, and the dynamics shift—alliances form, mediation becomes possible. Grow to ten people, and you need facilitation. A hundred people require organizational structure. A million people need institutions, laws, and governance ...
Read more