Skip to main content

money works

money makes the world go round: that's half true. money and people makes the world go round. sad to say, people are letting money make the world go round when it should be the other way around. people are working for money instead of letting money work for the people.

let's take a look at the three kinds of people-money relationship, which i have in mind.

employment: when one is employed, one is working for money. he works to receive money for him to use for daily activity. once depleted, the cycle is repeated. it's advantage: it's basic, no complications and no stress (depending on whose looking at it). drawback: unstable and routinary. once you're laid off, the pay stops and you need to look for another job.

business: when one owns a business, one is working with his money. to clarify, he is helping his money grow by making the business stay afloat. then the owner would hire managers to take charge of the operations so he can sit back. then, from time to time he takes part on the operations. that's better than being an employee, in so many ways. one disadvantage though. it consumes time. not like if you are going be an investor

investor:  when one invests, he uses his money to generate more money. sample would be time deposit, real estate, stocks, bonds, etc. simplest form would be saving up in a bank with compounding interest. that may return the smallest but adding it up to, let's say, 15 years: that's big. 1,500 monthly with 0.5%interest rate for 15 years would have a future value of 281,939.13, regardless of the currency(i think).

final note, make your money work for you. do not just work for money.

Popular

Using AI to Reinvent My Résumé and Try to Land an Interview

Creating a résumé is a tedious job to most. It's hard, time consuming and might even be the cause for rejection-if you don't know what you're doing. Fortunately, there are AI tools out there that created to assist, us humans, in generating résumé. It save's time, effort and you get higher chance of being hired.  But what if you're transitioning to an entirely different role? You don't have experience, no educational background to back it up. and no portfolio to show. What do you do? You come up with something creative. You come up with some that has never been done before. And, just wow them... or at least try. I was messaged in LinkedIn for a position that I was eyeing for in years. The HR guy reached out and we scheduled a call interview. We talked for more than half an hour and I was enlightened that my résumé is lack-luster. I was highly considered but the résumé is not at par because I have no job experience on AI, the certifications we're not included,...

Process Design & Workflow Optimization Using First-Principles Thinking (FPT)

Instead of copying existing process frameworks, let’s break down Process Design & Workflow Optimization from first principles —understanding the core problem it solves and building efficient workflows from the ground up. Step 1: What is a Process? At its most fundamental level, a process is just: Inputs → Resources, data, materials, or people. Actions → Steps that transform inputs into outputs. Outputs → The final result or outcome. A process is optimized when it minimizes waste, reduces friction, and improves efficiency without compromising quality. Step 2: Why Do Processes Become Inefficient? Processes break down when: ❌ Unnecessary steps exist → Extra approvals, redundant checks, or outdated rules. ❌ Bottlenecks appear → A single point slows down the entire system. ❌ Lack of automation → Manual tasks take too much time. ❌ Poor data flow → Information is siloed or delayed. ❌ Overcomplicated workflows → Too many dependencies and unclear roles. To fix i...

Contextual Stratification - Chapter 2: On Economics

And you thought physics and economics weren't related. In the decades following World War II, economists believed they had finally cracked the code. John Maynard Keynes had given them a framework as powerful, in its own way, as Newton's laws of motion. The economy, Keynes argued, could be managed like a machine. When recession threatened, governments should increase spending to stimulate demand. When inflation loomed, they should pull back. The equations were elegant. The logic was compelling. And for nearly three decades, it worked. Finance ministers spoke with the confidence of engineers. Central bankers made pronouncements with Newtonian certainty. The business cycle—that chaotic swing between boom and bust that had plagued capitalism since its inception—could be smoothed out through careful adjustment of a few key variables. Unemployment and inflation moved in predictable, inverse relationships. Push one down, the other rises. Pull the right levers, and you could keep both ...