Skip to main content

Pacquiao - Mayweather Jr: Why it wont happen.

Now that Manny Pacquiao proved he was right. What's next? Facing Floyd, that is. A thrilling idea that just became a concept: a what if. But why it will never happen?

Because Mayweather Jr. want's to retire as undefeated. This is the only reason I can think of. If you say he fears Manny, I don't think so. I bet he can stand toe to toe with Pacman. He has the skills. He is undefeated. And he knows how to box.

Now the question is why he wants to retire undefeated? Two reasons I can think of - money and/or prestige. You wont get anything else out of being undefeated except for those two. If you're undefeated, you're value goes up. You become famous. You have control over your fights... Things like those. Can't blame the man for thinking about his future. Specially if you have a colleague like Mike Tyson. Being reminded of how it will be without money will definitely make you think twice.

I'm just not sure why would he choose a good retirement over proving that he is the best. If I know that I am the best then I know that I can defeat whoever is placed in front of me. Specially for a boxer, nothing is more precious than proving to the world that I am the best. And for Mayweather Jr., that should be a piece of cake. That's if he, really, is the best.

Maybe this is all just work for him. A job that he was to do even if he doesn't want to do it. In a way that's being professional and I think I can admire him for that. But,being a boxing fan, or an spectator at least, I would think low of how a boxer he is. He maybe undisputed or undefeated, but he will never be the best or the greatest as far as my opinion is concern. Even without considering Pacquio in the picture, Marquez will be better or greater that him.

Being undisputed or undefeated doesn't mean being the greatest or the best.

Popular

that 80's show: turbo teen

i clearly remember that it was gma7, here in the philippines, that aired turbo teen every afternoon back then. although, i just saw it once and never even knew the title. i searched for it in google with "man turns into car" keywords and followed the search to turbo teen. here's the intro

Exploring the Riemann Hypothesis Through the Lens of Contextual Stratification

The Riemann Hypothesis stands as one of mathematics’ most profound unsolved problems. It concerns the distribution of prime numbers and the zeros of the Riemann zeta function, offering a tantalizing promise: if proven, it could unlock deep secrets about the fabric of numbers and even influence fields like cryptography and quantum physics. But what if we step back and ask not just how to solve the Riemann Hypothesis, but where it fits in the grand scheme of knowledge? This is where the Contextual Stratification Knowledge Framework (CSKF) —with its equation Q=Fλ, Q⊆M —comes into play. CSKF provides a meta-framework for understanding how knowledge, theories, and frameworks relate to reality across all domains, from physics to art to mathematics. Could the Riemann Hypothesis be interpreted through the lens of CSKF? The answer is a resounding yes . While CSKF doesn’t offer a direct path to proving or disproving the hypothesis, it provides a powerful way to contextualize its significance ...

Ontology Is Destiny: Why AI Needs a Core Identity

Let’s get one thing straight: AI doesn’t have an identity crisis. It has no identity at all . That’s not a bug — it’s how we built it. We gave these systems oceans of data, a tsunami of parameters, and told them: “Figure it out.” But without a structure for what to figure out and why, what we got back is a kind of super-intelligent improv artist — good at playing any role, but unsure what show it’s even in. Enter: Ontology . What Is Ontology, Really? Ontology is the art of deciding what exists and how it relates. It’s not just a list of things — it’s the why and how behind what gets to count as "real" in a system’s mental model. In human terms, it’s the difference between knowing words and understanding a worldview. In AI terms? It’s the leap from autocomplete to actual comprehension. Without ontology , AI is like a toddler in a library. With ontology , it’s like a philosopher with a map — one who can also fly a spaceship. Why This Matters Now As AI moves from tool to co-agen...