Skip to main content

saving money weekly

I came across a an idea called 52 Week Money Challenge. Let me share to you how it works. The idea is to save Php62,900.00 in 52 weeks(one year) and we start with only Php50.00.

What is it?

From the label 52 Week Money Challenge, it's a Challenge. It's about saving Money. It runs for 52 weeks (1 year). In a nutshell, you religiously save an increasing amount for the whole year.

How do you do it?

  1. For the first week, you save Php50.00.
  2. On the second week, you save the same amount as last week, which is Php50.00 - plus additional Php50.00. That's Php100.00
  3. On the third week, you save the same amount as last week, which is Php100.00 - Plus additional Php50.00. That's Php150.00
  4. On the fourth week, you save the same amount as last week, which is Php150.00 - Plus additional Php50.00. That's Php200.00
  5. You repeat the cycle for one year or 52 weeks.
  6. Enjoy your money.

Minimum Requirements:

  • Make sure you can wait for one year
  • You have an income for at least a year
  • You can afford to set aside the amount of the last week. If you are using Php50.00 as base, then that's Php2,600
Tips: 
  • Put it in a bank account to avoid the temptation of spending your money
  • Have a goal on how to use it when you are done. (eg. cellphone, project car, travel)
  • You can change the base depending on what you can afford. If you are a student you might want to start with Php10.00 or Php20.00
If you think this is not effective to you, then consider changing some of the parameters. Say, reverse it(which i am using). Start from the biggest amount(Php2,600). Or, if you have an erratic amount of income, then just choose what you can afford on the week. I'll be discussing this next time since i have just thought of it right now.

Happy Saving!

Popular

Using AI to Reinvent My Résumé and Try to Land an Interview

Creating a résumé is a tedious job to most. It's hard, time consuming and might even be the cause for rejection-if you don't know what you're doing. Fortunately, there are AI tools out there that created to assist, us humans, in generating résumé. It save's time, effort and you get higher chance of being hired.  But what if you're transitioning to an entirely different role? You don't have experience, no educational background to back it up. and no portfolio to show. What do you do? You come up with something creative. You come up with some that has never been done before. And, just wow them... or at least try. I was messaged in LinkedIn for a position that I was eyeing for in years. The HR guy reached out and we scheduled a call interview. We talked for more than half an hour and I was enlightened that my résumé is lack-luster. I was highly considered but the résumé is not at par because I have no job experience on AI, the certifications we're not included,...

Process Design & Workflow Optimization Using First-Principles Thinking (FPT)

Instead of copying existing process frameworks, let’s break down Process Design & Workflow Optimization from first principles —understanding the core problem it solves and building efficient workflows from the ground up. Step 1: What is a Process? At its most fundamental level, a process is just: Inputs → Resources, data, materials, or people. Actions → Steps that transform inputs into outputs. Outputs → The final result or outcome. A process is optimized when it minimizes waste, reduces friction, and improves efficiency without compromising quality. Step 2: Why Do Processes Become Inefficient? Processes break down when: ❌ Unnecessary steps exist → Extra approvals, redundant checks, or outdated rules. ❌ Bottlenecks appear → A single point slows down the entire system. ❌ Lack of automation → Manual tasks take too much time. ❌ Poor data flow → Information is siloed or delayed. ❌ Overcomplicated workflows → Too many dependencies and unclear roles. To fix i...

Contextual Stratification - Chapter 2: On Economics

And you thought physics and economics weren't related. In the decades following World War II, economists believed they had finally cracked the code. John Maynard Keynes had given them a framework as powerful, in its own way, as Newton's laws of motion. The economy, Keynes argued, could be managed like a machine. When recession threatened, governments should increase spending to stimulate demand. When inflation loomed, they should pull back. The equations were elegant. The logic was compelling. And for nearly three decades, it worked. Finance ministers spoke with the confidence of engineers. Central bankers made pronouncements with Newtonian certainty. The business cycle—that chaotic swing between boom and bust that had plagued capitalism since its inception—could be smoothed out through careful adjustment of a few key variables. Unemployment and inflation moved in predictable, inverse relationships. Push one down, the other rises. Pull the right levers, and you could keep both ...