Skip to main content

Yet Another AI Destroys Job Article

Why Small and Medium Business Leaders Must Include Position Risk Analysis in Their AI Understanding

Two years ago, a mid-sized logistics firm in Cebu adopted an AI routing system that promised faster delivery and lower fuel costs. Within months, routes optimized, errors dropped, and customers were thrilled. But then came the internal chaos; dispatch officers, data clerks, and schedulers suddenly found their roles irrelevant. Morale plummeted. The owner hadn’t anticipated that success would come with human displacement.

He fixed the tech problem, but broke the human system.


Today, every small and medium business leader is being pulled into the AI race. There’s pressure to automate, digitize, and “modernize”. But, few stop to assess what parts of their organization are most at risk from that very progress.

AI understanding isn’t just about how tools work. It’s about understanding what those tools will do to your people, your structure, and your strategy.

Yet, most SMBs dive into automation without a framework to assess internal risk. They know what AI can do, but not what it will undo.


When leaders fail to map position risk, they create silent fractures in their organization.

Without analysis, three dangers emerge:

1. Automation Shock – Roles disappear faster than they can be redefined. This leads to layoffs, confusion, and hidden resentment.

2. Redundancy Risk – Some jobs duplicate what AI already does, but leaders keep them out of habit — wasting time and money.

3. Strategic Blindness – Without linking AI projects to the company’s core value chain, businesses automate the wrong areas and weaken their human advantage.

The irony? Many SMBs adopt AI to “empower” their people, yet end up eroding human adaptability and trust because they never planned the transition.


This is where Position Risk Analysis (PRA) becomes essential, not as an HR formality, but as a leadership tool.

PRA maps every position against five dimensions:

  • Automation Susceptibility
  • Redundancy Risk
  • Strategic Alignment
  • Human Uniqueness
  • Adaptability Quotient

The outcome is your Position Volatility Index: a simple, visual indicator of which roles are at risk, which are safe, and which can evolve into higher-value work.

By integrating PRA into your AI adoption roadmap, you transform chaos into clarity:

- You protect your workforce while upgrading your system.

- You redeploy talent instead of discarding it.

- You align AI investments with real strategic value.


In essence, Position Risk Analysis isn’t just about saving jobs, it’s about saving meaning inside your organization.

AI will not destroy jobs. Leaders who fail to foresee the impact of AI will.

The best SMBs of the next decade will not be the fastest adopters of AI. They will be the wisest interpreters of human-AI coexistence.


Start your AI journey not with tools, but with truth about your positions.

That’s where real digital leadership begins.

Popular

how to add map on blogs

Im working on another blog of a friend about her restaurant  and found a need to put a map So, I went to Google for assistance. Lo and behold, it assisted. Now, let me share to you how it goes.(pics to follow) open  maps.google.com search for the location click the gear at the bottom right corner click "Share and embed map" click "Embed map" tab choose the size copy the html code paste it to you blog

Contextual Stratification - Chapter 13: Boundaries

  Where Things Get Interesting We've built a complete picture: Fields (F) define domains with specific rules. Scales (λ) determine context within those domains. Quanta (Q) are what appears when you observe a field at a scale. Measurability (M) constrains what can appear. The equation Q=Fλ, Q⊆M generates valid frameworks. And this stratification continues infinitely; no ground floor, no ultimate emergence, scales within scales forever. But if reality is structured this way, the most important question becomes: where do the boundaries lie? Boundaries are where one field gives way to another. Where one scale regime transitions to a different regime. Where the measurable space changes. Where frameworks that worked perfectly well suddenly break down. Boundaries are where theories fail, where paradoxes emerge, where the most interesting phenomena occur. Understanding boundaries is understanding the architecture of reality itself. This chapter shows you how to recognize them, what happens...

AI, Languages and Neuro-Kernels

“A radical rethinking of OS architecture for the age of AI: from legacy kernels to self-optimizing neuro-kernels powered by contextual intelligence.” I believe that the future will ditch Linux and Windows because AI will create it's own kernel that's ready to be fused with AI model to become neuro-kernel. Why? Because they were not created for AI. They were created several decades ago when LLM wasn’t even a phrase. They were born out of necessity, not intention — a way to make silicon respond to keyboards, screens, and human commands. Over time, they adapted: adding graphical user interfaces like Window User Interface and desktop environments of Linux, supporting mobile devices such as Android and iOS, and surviving by bolting on complexity, you get the gist. But at their core, they are still human-first operating systems, not built for real-time machine reasoning, context shifts, or model-to-model communication. Now Let's Talk Inefficiencies The inefficiencies are baked in...