Skip to main content

Porsche’s EV Misfire: When Legacy Confuses Itself for a Trend

Porsche AG just reported nearly $1 billion in losses, driven by an EV pullback and global tariffs. The market reads it as bad luck; tariffs, demand slump, global EV fatigue. But the deeper signal is cultural: Porsche tried to race in the wrong lane.

To the public, petrol Porsches are heritage objects. They are roaring pieces of art, forever linked to the romance of motion and the lineage of engineering mastery. To the company, however, the latest news shows a brand trying to reinvent itself as a tech player, shifting its soul toward battery packs and software dashboards. It is as if Rolex decided it must become the Apple Watch. In doing so, Porsche risks losing what made it an institution — a heritage brand.

In 19 Consultin's Institutional Value Index framework, Porsche traditionally scores high on Legacy (9.3/10) and Cultural Depth (8.8/10), but only moderately on Adaptability (6.5/10) and Tech Integration (5.9/10). This means its market power is not derived from innovation speed. It is derived from symbolic permanence. Its customers do not buy Porsche for the next software update; they buy it for what it represents: mastery, craftsmanship, continuity. When a legacy brand treats itself as a commodity, it loses its “institutional gravity”, the unseen weight that makes it untouchable in volatile markets.

Porsche should not compete with EV startups. It should compete above them. The right move isn’t to electrify its identity but to electrify its mystique. Continue EV development, but release it as concepts of philosophy, not mere products. As limited editions, auto show prototypes, rolling design statements that test sentiment and signal evolution without disowning tradition.

The brand’s strength lies in curated permanence, not mass transition. The moment Porsche learns that its petrol engines are its “Rolex line” and its EVs are its “Apple experiments,” it regains narrative control. And in the age of narrative economics, that’s where institutional value truly compounds.

 - For legacy companies: stop trying to become the future. Define it.

 - For consultants and innovators: measure not just market fit, but institutional value.

Labels:

Popular

Scrolls, Not Just Scripts: Rethinking AI Cognition

Most people still treat AI like a really clever parrot with a thesaurus and internet access. It talks, it types, it even rhymes — but let’s not kid ourselves: that’s a script, not cognition . If we want more than superficial smarts, we need a new mental model. Something bigger than prompts, cleaner than code, deeper than just “what’s your input-output?” That’s where scrolls come in. Scripts Are Linear. Scrolls Are Alive. A script tells an AI what to do. A scroll teaches it how to think . Scripts are brittle. Change the context, and they break like a cheap command-line program. Scrolls? Scrolls evolve. They hold epistemology, ethics, and emergent behavior — not just logic, but logic with legacy. Think of scrolls as living artifacts of machine cognition . They don’t just run — they reflect . The Problem With Script-Thinking Here’s the trap: We’ve trained AIs to be performers , not participants . That’s fine if you just want clever autocomplete. But if you want co-agents — minds that co...
Read more

Contextual Stratification - Chapter 16: Human Psychology

  The Divided Self Physics stratifies cleanly—quantum here, classical there, clear boundaries. Consciousness stratifies across perspective—neural observable from outside, experiential accessible from inside. But human psychology stratifies within a single person, within a single moment, creating something we all experience but rarely understand: internal conflict . You know you should exercise, but you don't feel like it. You want dessert, even though you're trying to eat healthily. You believe honesty is important, yet you find yourself lying. You're drawn to someone you know is wrong for you. You procrastinate on important work while doing trivial tasks. You hold contradictory beliefs, pursue incompatible goals, feel pulled in opposite directions. Standard psychology treats this as a problem to solve. Cognitive dissonance theory says we're motivated to eliminate contradictions. Rational choice theory says we should maximize consistent utility. Self-control research fr...
Read more

Contextual Stratification - Chapter 17: Social Systems

  Beyond the Individual One person experiences internal conflict across psychological fields. But people don't exist in isolation. We form groups, organizations, institutions, societies and at each scale of social organization, something remarkable happens: new patterns emerge that can't be predicted from individual psychology alone. This is one of the deepest puzzles in social science: the relationship between individual and collective. Are societies "just" collections of individuals? Can we explain social phenomena by understanding individual behavior and aggregating it? Or do collective systems have their own irreducible properties, their own patterns that constrain and shape individual action? Economics debates micro versus macro. Sociology debates agency versus structure. Political science debates individual rationality versus institutional logic. Psychology debates personal choice versus social influence. Each field encounters the same boundary, struggles with t...
Read more