Skip to main content

On Philippine Constitutional Reform



For years, my country, the Philippines, has lived under a plague of uncertainty, disorientation, and quiet despair. It’s not even dramatic anymore; an undeniable pessimistic prognosis.

I’ve witnessed graft, corruption, and bribery so many times across administrations, from Ramos' all the way to Marcos'. To which, the electoral process itself feels less like a democratic ritual and more like a cyclical delusion. Trust eroded not in one catastrophic moment, but in countless small betrayals.

If you know what I know, you will not vote either. Yes, I stopped voting from Ramos. Don't ask.

Halfway through a PGMN YouTube episode “The Ultimate Discussion on Constitutional Reform” hosted by James Deakin, something snapped. I paused the video, sat back, and realized: I’ve heard this same conversation for decades.

The panel was articulate, the arguments compelling, and the intentions sincere. They circled around a central thesis: the constitution needs to be changed. And on that, rightfully so, I agree.

But here’s where I step off the train. They call the problem “deep root cause systemic issues.” I don’t think that’s accurate. Or deep enough.

Because the truth is more dangerous:

Our crisis predates systems and sits deeper than laws: Our crisis is philosophical and societal.

Calling it “systemic” gives the comforting illusion that a structural overhaul will unlock a national renaissance. It implies the machine is broken, and if we just fix the wiring, the country will work as intended.

No. The wiring isn’t the problem. The operators are misaligned, the worldview is fragmented, and the nation's philosophical foundation is incoherent.

The constitution is merely a legal expression of a society’s maturity. Ours mirrors our fragmentation.

We cannot reform what we have not outgrown.

What we’re facing is not a deficient charter but a deficient civic philosophy. A nation that has not yet resolved its identity cannot stabilize its institutions. A society that distrusts itself cannot produce a constitution it trusts.

So while I agree that constitutional change is necessary, I cannot conflate necessity with primacy. Because at the root of every failed reform is an unexamined worldview, a fragile social fabric, and a people who have never been taught to imagine a nation beyond survival mode.

To say the problem is “systemic” is still too shallow. The real problem is substructure: what we believe, how we behave, how we relate to authority, to truth, to community, and to the future.

No constitution can solve that. But a society that resolves the problem at the foundation will naturally demand and then eventually create a better constitution.

This is where the conversation must go next.

Labels:

Popular

Quire (second draft)

  And the one that seeks thought, “I am ready to choose a path.” For doctrines have been read, gods compared, and rituals weighed in silence. He remembered the fire, where light was not worshiped but judged, and darkness was a choice, not a curse. He remembered the breath, where suffering was neither punished nor forgiven, but dissolved through stillness. He remembered the songs, where duty danced with illusion, and war itself was made holy by detachment. He remembered the resurrection, where the dismembered was remembered, and death was a gate, not an end. He remembered the teachings, etched in covenant, wrapped in law, carried by a people into exile and return. He remembered the prayers, whispered in caves, awaiting a kingdom not of this world. He remembered the tongues, where serpents taught silence and fire moved through spine and breath. And the thought wandered, and sleep came as a shadow without warning, and the dream began in the lowest of places. And he beheld h...
Read more

Wrestling with an Old Acer Laptop to Install ALBERT—And Winning!

You know that feeling when you take an old, battle-worn laptop and make it do something it was never meant to handle? That’s exactly what we did when we decided to install ALBERT (A Lite BERT) on an aging Acer laptop. If you’ve ever tried deep learning on old hardware, you’ll understand why this was part engineering challenge, part act of stubborn defiance. The Challenge: ALBERT on a Senior Citizen of a Laptop The laptop in question? A dusty old Acer machine (N3450 2.2 GHz, 4gb ram), still running strong (well, kind of) but never meant to handle modern AI workloads. The mission? Get PyTorch, Transformers, and ALBERT running on it—without CUDA, because, let’s be real, this laptop’s GPU is more suited for Minesweeper than machine learning. Step 1: Clearing Space (Because 92% Disk Usage Ain’t It) First order of business: making room. A quick df -h confirmed what we feared—only a few gigabytes of storage left. Old logs, forgotten downloads, and unnecessary packages were sent to digita...
Read more

colt mirage diecast

searching for photos of the defunct 78-83 mitsubishi colt mirage led me to this site: http://www.modellbahnecke.de/minichamps.htm and this photo a red 1978 mitsubishi colt priced at 36,95 €. there's also a blue one in their stock. maybe i should buy one. although it's not my priority, for now, i'll just post it here to give me some inspiration. here's their catalog cover for 2009 (to inspire)
Read more